As a photographer progresses from being a simple beginner to becoming an enthusiast, questions of choosing which lenses to add to their arsenal eventually arises. Every photographer eventually asks this question multiple times in a life-long pursuit and maintenance of photography equipment: “Prime lens or zoom lens?”
Like most people, I started out in photography with a trusty 18-55mm zoom kit lens. Then I got a 55-300mm zoom lens to cover the telephoto range. Then I started browsing photography forums and learned about the alleged higher performance of fixed-focal-length prime lenses. After a year or two, I started switching to prime lenses for their higher performance and compact nature. In fact, there was a good full year where every lens in my camera bag was a prime. Then I got a zoom lens again, and as of the date of this article my lens collection consists of one zoom lens and two prime lenses.
Now having stood on both sides of the fence with regards to the zoom versus prime debate, I believe I can provide an unbiased opinion on this matter. I am not interested in some kind of theological or philosophical correctness, but rather in sharing advice with others who may be pondering this matter, so everyone can be well-informed and can make their purchase investments wisely.
Prime lenses deliver better image quality and help you hone your composition techniques by restricting you to a fixed focal length perspective. Doing this really improves your photography. Learning to “zoom with your feet” helps to train your photographic eye.
However, zoom lenses have an incredibly valuable quality – they can turn opportunities into realities. Photographic opportunities could be lost by the time you finished “zooming with your feet” and got into position, or switched to another lens that delivers your preferred perspective in your artists’ mind, or if you just do not have the proper lens with you. The best optical quality and compositional skill in the world are wasted if you cannot exploit opportunities that arise. Even if you paid a model for a photo-shoot, you are burning away time and money as you switch lenses to-and-fro. Never mind that the classic photographers from decades ago only used fixed-focal-length lenses – they did not have zoom lenses at the time! Fun fact: many people decry the all-in-one 28-300mm zoom lens as a lazy excuse for convenience, producing unacceptable compromises in quality. But the still-living legendary photographer Jay Maisel does a lot of photography with that lens only… Oops for the critics and pixel-peepers – do they have a portfolio comparable to Jay’s? 😛
In other words, if I have the chance to recommend lens selections, I will go by the following rules:
1. Consider zoom lenses first, every time. A good quality zoom lens may be more expensive than a prime lens, but the extra investment cost could pay off because after investing in a prime lens, you might find that you really need the focal length range that the prime lens could not provide. Then eventually you still end up buying the zoom lens – essentially paying twice! 😦
2. Consider a prime lens only if you know you have an affinity for a particular focal length. It will really help train your photographic eye. However I recommend that you do not spend too much unless you are earning money from taking pictures at that focal length.
3. Eventually you will start applying the compositional and perspective lessons you have learned from using fixed focal length lenses to your usage of zoom lenses. Reaping benefits from both formats!
4. Consider a prime lens if you have specialty needs such as macro, or if you are earning money from photography and can justify that extra “oompf” at image quality that a prime lens can deliver.
5. Weight should also be a consideration. Zoom lenses are usually heavier. A zoom lens is useless if you prefer to leave it at home, or if it is too heavy and bulky for the way you want to use it in the field.
Hope this information is helpful!